 |
|
Arrived at Tesco to fill up with petrol |
I Met Andrew at
Tesco at 6:30 am. Andrew had discovered a
huge flat spot at about 2000 rpm on the way from Thatcham. Since the car had
only traveled 1/2 mile before today, we shouldn't have been surprised.. He
was quite worried at the lack of power uphill, if you got the revs wrong. We
discussed it briefly, whilst Andrew filled the car up, and decided he could
gently drive through it and that it was simply a case of mixture too weak.
No time to change it and we decided against it anyway so as not to upset the
emissions settings. We set off in convoy for Leighton Buzzard. By the time
we got to Chievely it was raining - quite hard, with a fair amount of spray
off of the wheels of passing cars. Sat
behind Andrew in my "tin top", I cursed quietly
under my breath, wondering what it was like for him. I saw his lights come
on and the windscreen wipers start sweeping the windscreen. Well at least
they work - so it's not all bad. Later I asked Andrew what it was like? He
said, "No problem. I only got wet whilst waiting at the traffic lights." We
soon ran out of the rain, and though dull and sometimes a little misty, it
never returned. Andrew began to work the speed up as he got used to the
handling and the traffic allowed. On the occasions when he decided to try
it out, once past the flat spot it certainly accelerated well, leaving my
tin top well in its wake. However, it was a cautious drive, from my
position the car looked like it was going well. I could predict it's speed
at various points in the journey 40, 50, 70 mph which gave me confidence in
the speedometer programming. The remainder of the journey was uneventful,
A34 to M40 Junction 9 (Oxford), A43 Bicester, A41 Aylsbury, A418 Leighton
Buzzard, apart from one stop for an agricultural comfort break and for
Andrew to have cigarette. A505 to the Test Centre, we arrived with 5 minutes
to spare after a reasonably relaxed journey. Total distance 70 miles.
|
|

 |
|
Leighton Buzzard Test Centre |
We reported to
reception and were told to put the car in to a 3rd lane next to a Refuse
Truck. With the Westfield dwarfed by
surrounding trucks we waited for our tester to appear. Andrew offered me a
sandwich, gratefully accepted, whilst he had a cup of coffee. It seemed like
ages waiting there but was probably no longer than 5 minutes. Mid way
through eating and drinking Richard Taylor and his "apprentice, John" (as he
introduced himself) appeared. The sandwiches and coffee caused some light
relief as we introduced ourselves and they set about scrutinizing the car.
Insisting that we carry on eating and drinking. Funny, I had lost my
appetite.
With one at
the back and the other at the front, peering and poking, observing and
feeling, faces expressionless, there is no indication of what they are
checking or what is going through their minds. During the course of this
Andrew noticed that that John's first move was to check the radius of the
rear light reflectors, but merely by feeling them with his hands, Richards
head had disappeared under the dash. We felt we were pretty well covered up
under there. They stand back at frequent intervals and peer intently at the
car, swap ends and continue in the same way. Not knowing what they are
thinking is both disconcerting and frustrating. |
 |
|
"Very nicely put together" |
I came back to
Andrew and Richard chatting about things in general, including Richard's
driving experiences. I talked to John. It turns out he is a former "AA" man
( Nothing to do with alcohol) he has just done the 3 week SVA course. The
atmosphere seems a little bit more cordial as we wait for one of the lanes
in the "shed " to become free. Out of the blue, still looking at the car,
Richard says "Very nicely put together" It sounds sincere and It gives you a
bit of a warm glow.
At Richards request Andrew
drives over he pit on to the turning plates to check the steering.. Richard
instructs Andrew to turn full lock in both directions whilst he examines the
cycle wing positions in relation to the bodywork and headlights and the
Aeroquips do not foul the cycle wings or bodywork. Richard tells me that he
thinks, it is possible under rough terrain conditions and full lock that the
cycle wings may come in to contact with the headlamps. "It doesn't at the
moment.” "Put a blob of Tippex on the cycle wings and check if it does
sometime". Andrew drove off the turning pads as requested.
 |
|
Over the pit |
John disappears below in to the
pit. Richard now walks round the car asking Andrew to operate the lights and
indicators whilst he observes. They all work normally. Richard follows John
down in to he pit. This is quite nerve-racking pushing and pulling, shaking
and rocking he car. Instructions to Andrew to operate the brakes and
handbrake, "On, Off, Release" are shouted up from the depths. Andrew found
it quite disconcerting as he had no idea what was going on under the car.
I sensed we were approaching
headlight-setting time. I had asked Andrew ,"What size spanner do we need?,
" " 13/16 I think" he replies. I wander off to the car to get the
spanner. Not wishing to appear obvious I put the spanner in my pocket. When
I got back Richard and John were still down in he pit. The first thing that
goes through your mind is, What's the problem?. No indication is discernable
on their faces as they emerged from the pit. |
|
Part of he
SVA course must be, how to keep a dead straight face under all circumstances
to ensure the customer is confused and kept in the dark. As the test
progressed I was aware that Richard is constantly grimacing , half smiling,
shrugging his shoulders and shaking his head, muttering to himself, at
strategic points. You certainly can't read anything in to this. John is
quite different and will engage in conversation as well as explain what is
going on at various points in
the
test.
Richard
wheeled up the headlight setting equipment and set it up for direction and
height in front of the car. Andrew switched on the lights using both dip and
main beam as requested. Richard looked up from the instrument and says
"Would you care to adjust it? In a flash I produced the spanner from my
pocket. Richard is decidedly under whelmed, but almost raises a smile.
"Can't you do it without?" I explain we have tightened them up. I loosen
the OS headlight, with John's assistance holding he lamp and ensuring that I
don't clatter the spanner against the bodywork. John now directs the lamp at
Richard’s instruction until he is satisfied. Looking in to the top of the
instrument, you can see the pattern of the light against a graduated scale.
Satisfied, Richard directed me to tighten up the lamp. Unfortunately it
moved during the process and had to be re-done. John held the lamp in place
whilst I tightened it once again. “Was it too high” I asked – “No too low”
was the reply. Now it was OK and we repeated the procedure for the NS lamp.
We had deliberately not set up the headlights. Having read of someone else’s
experience, which basically says the testers will only trust their own
instruments and will want the headlights adjusted anyway. In the event we
were pretty close and only a small adjustment was required.
We moved on to brake testing on
the rollers, front wheels first. I informed Richard that we have and LSD he
replies that he had realized that. Richard operates the rollers from the
booth, calling instructions to Andrew over the intercom system. Initial
brake testing completed Andrew was asked to don the
aluminium
shoe connected to the pressure meter. It is not easy to put on, strapped to
the bottom of your shoe and to get on to the brake pedal, in the restricted
space in the foot well. From memory tests were carried out at 5, 10,15, 20,
25 Kgf. The procedure was repeated for the rear wheels. All this passed
without comment.
Outside the
shed once again Andrew was told to park the car with the exhaust pointing
towards the shed and about 10 to 15 ft away. John appeared with a ball on
the end of a stick and apiece of angled metal. The
angled metal was used to position, what I realised
was the noise meter. John asked Andrew to start the engine and rev to 3,500
rpm. The meter registered over 101 db (a failure). John asked Andrew to
reduce the revs to 3,000 rpm. As far as I could tell (the meter was upside
down from my position), it registered 98.4 db. John pronounced it as a JUST
pass. On reflection, if it had failed (using a standard Westfield exhaust
system) I would have asked for a re -test pointing away from the shed. to
eliminate noise bouncing back from the shed. Still, it did not matter. I
thanked John for giving us the benefit of reduced rpm. "We have a fairly
relaxed attitude to these things" he said. "That is until we give you 1 1/2
pages." joined in Richard.
Emissions tests came next.
Andrew moved the car nearer the building and I removed the bonnet. John
asked the age of the engine, 1995. "There is no catalytic converter?" asked
Richard. "No - straight carburetion." was my reply. The test equipment had
been calibrating in still air, whilst we were doing the noise checks.
Richard inserted the probe in to the exhaust and asked Andrew to rev the
engine and hold it at that specific speed whilst the reading stabilized. The
flat spot and the state of the engine tune made this quite difficult. Andrew
was struggling to hold the revs constant and was getting tired. Eventually
Richard concluded the test and took a printout, removed the HT pick up lead
from No.1 plug (This is the equipment measured the engine revs) and the
exhaust probe. John asked why we had chosen carburetors. On the spur of the
moment I replied "Less expensive than fuel injection Richard kept
Andrew idling the engine for what seemed and age. "What's going on". I
asked Andrew. “I think he is re-calibrating the equipment and waiting for
the readings to settle”. About 15 minutes later , when he was ready,
Richard inserted the probe again and tested the engine at idle. Shortly
after Richard printed the results of this test. Andrew asked if we could
have a copy of the printout and was told yes. Whilst John got the ramps and
scales ready,
Richard
explained the Emission Test results as
really a standard MOT test in
accordance with 1992 regulations. It passed easily.
The remainder of the
test
was a bit of a blur. John positioned the scales and ramps, and the car
pushed backwards up the ramps and on to
the
scales. It was weighed with and without Andrew in the driving seat. I
couldn't see what the readings were. but it was accompanied by sarcastic
remarks from John and Richard on how much Andrew weighed. Off the scales
again The track and wheelbase were measured. I understand as part of the
weight calculations. No comment.
We were on
the final lap the car was re-positioned away from the building again.
Richard got in, with some difficulty, and adjusted the mirrors. He is a big
guy, it was just as difficult to get out again. Richard then proceeded to
wander around the car at some distance. John explained he was checking the
angles of view, He indicated that the side repeaters were where we could
come unstuck. The strange bracket to measure the height of the seat belts
was placed in the car. Measurements were OK followed by careful examination
of he seat belt anchorages again, they had also been checked earlier as part
if the initial scrutineering. Next came a pole with markings on it,
clearly used for checking
the
height of various lights with max and min distances marked on various faces
on he bar. No reaction from Richard at all.
Richard climbed back in he car
and started the engine and disappeared, with the car. John explained that he
was checking the Speedo . The yellow lines on the tarmac were for HGV and
the red lines for SVA. Richard reappeared in the car. I'm not used to
seeing it being driven it certainly sounds and looks good. Richard rejoins
us "A flat spot!"
you
said. "If
you put your foot down it dies!" We explain again, that the engine is not
tuned up yet and we plan to put it in a rolling road as soon as it is
registered, but it is driveable,
if you gentle your way through it. I've yet to work out how he managed to
drive the car in industrial steel toe cap safety boots - but he did. No
comment was made on the accuracy of the speedo.
Richard and John look at each
other and mutter something about the heater pipe. Richard motions us to
remove the bonnet. They look again at the heater hose picked up during
initial scrutineering . John asked if the pipe was plastic or metal. The
pipe is aluminium,
powder coated. He explained that it touches the underside if the coil
bracket. " You say you have a piece of heater hose in the car". I went off
to fetch it. I returned with a length of 5/8 hose, two cable ties and a
“Stanley” knife and a pair of snips. I was making a pigs ear of cutting the
hose. John took it from me and said he would do it in a vice. He returned,
not only with it cut, but split down the middle. Gave it to me. I wrapped it
around the pipe and secured it with cable ties
and cut them off. John and Richard inspected it and were satisfied |
 |
|
Test over - Now the wait. |
"Put bonnet on and take the car
back to the car park". said Richard. It was just over 2 ½ hours. There now
followed about a twenty-minute wait. Andrew and I chatted over the test.
Chris Masters had said " To fill the underside of the set belt anchorages
with "Sikoflex" to hide the fact that the bolts don't go completely through
the mountings". I had forgotten - could this be a problem? coffee doesn't
do anything, to calm the nerves.
Eventually Richard and John
return with the ...MAC - WE HAVE PASSED, AT THE FIRST ATTEMPT... With
effusive thanks for their help we left. Still not believing we have done
it. Almost 3 hours to the minute. Mobile phones were quickly pressed in to
action to call those back home, with the good news.
 |
|
The Certificate |
The journey back home was more
pleasant with occasional breaks of sunshine. Andrew was clearly enjoying
himself and getting used
to the car. Back home there was much animated discussion as we shared our
impressions from our different vantage points.
On
reflection we think that, within the first few minutes of seeing the car.
the quality of the build, attention to detail, particularly to known SVA
fail items, the general finish of the vehicle they had made up their minds
on what they were looking at. Certainly by the end of scrutineering they
were comfortable. They had seen all cables were neat and secure. Richard had
mentioned, some time during the test, that the main cable loom from the back
the dash to the fuse boxes was exposed and could have been covered up with
carpet. He agreed it was difficult with such a thick loom. We did not
elaborate that it will be covered up by the supplementary instrument panel
when fitted. However that aside they felt and observed that we had covered
all bolts and edges under the dash. Radiused the front exhaust pipe clamp
and rear lamp clusters. We had put 5 mm edging strip around the back of the
rear number plate and the around the fog and reversing lamps. We think this
set the seal on the day. If they had been unhappy at this stage they would
have gone through everything with a fine tooth comb. Of course, they had to
go through the test, in case some safety item cropped up or some other
failure appeared, but it coloured
their attitude towards the car and us.
At no time did the infamous
cones and orbs come out. Neither were we asked to produce any documentation
on engine or other components.
We express our thanks to Richard Taylor and to John for
the manner and way they conducted the test and for the MAC. We thank Chris
Masters, Steve Richards, Ed Cane and Nigel Burton for their help in
securing a successful SVA test. |